Sunday, October 24, 2004

Requiem for a Lightweight

And so der Gövernor’s California Performance Review project staggers on towards well deserved oblivion. Last week his handpicked CPR Commission, which he set up in June to "facilitate public input" on the Review team proposals (i.e. to create the appearance of community participation) held its final meeting.

Press reports suggest that the Commissioners were less than enthusiastic about the recommendations handed them by the Review team, and could agree only on a 15-page "outline of expansive goals for restructuring state government" (politely known as "platitudes" a/k/a "bullshit".) A typical news headline sums it up: "Panel supports many parts of California government overhaul", which is like saying "Apple not completely rotten." The diligent reader scanning the news would find the heading reinforced with phrases like "qualified endorsement" "urge the governor to scrap some of the recommendations" and "a well-intentioned but half-baked hodgepodge that needs more work and public exposure". In addition to swirling allegations of improper access by oil industry lobbyists, we now have evidence confirming incompetence: "many proposals were crafted by people with no experience or knowledge of the subjects they worked on."

"'I know nothing about education,' said Dills, who is a staff attorney for the Department of Social Services. Nevertheless, Dills was asked to draft a radical overhaul of education governance. Of 14 staffers drafting education reform proposals, only four work in education. The rest were from departments such as transportation, veterans affairs and the Franchise Tax Board. 'Much of the time, we were doing something not to make the state better but to forward someone's ego,' he said."

It seems that the disenchantment crosses party lines. Commissioner and State Assemblyman Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, "did not attend the meeting because he said he would not sign on to recommendations that were 'half- cooked.'" Commissioner and Assembly member Pat Bates, R-Laguna Niguel, said "'there needs to be another vetting process' because many members of the public have pointed out potential flaws in the plan." And as Professor Tax noted back in August, the non-partisan Legislative Analyst has concluded that the CPR team greatly overstated claimed budget savings, so that:

"Reforms proposed in the California Performance Review won't solve the state's budget problems... Hill said Schwarzenegger's administration believes the reforms could save the state $32 billion over five years. Hill said a more realistic figure is $10 billion to $15 billion."

What a relief! Professor Tax is happy to learn that he is not alone in seeing the CPR as "a facade, a graphic designer's idea of what a management consultant's report should look like." Responsible political figures, it seems, recognize a "Hollywood movie approach to state government", and they understand that California cannot operate solely on camera tricks and special effects magic. The Professor will gladly put the CPR report into his blue recycle basket, and move this blog on to new topics. Fortunately, there's a steady supply of fresh material in the intersection zone of "taxes, higher education, business frauds and California politics".

Before we leave the CPR, however, let's look one last time for "lessons learned". Can we squeeze a moral out of the whole shabby affair -- other than "Morals Tomorrow, Comedy, Comedy, Comedy, Comedy, Comedy, Tonite!" What does this episode reveal about der Groepenegger's approach to the role of Governor? Why, after launching the CPR to great fanfare, is he now "cautious", "unsure" and "doesn't want to do something really stupid"? Why did the Review result in a reform package so inherently flawed that it is bound to fail? (Hint: ask yourself what Producer Max Bialystock had to gain by selling dozens of 50% shares in a Broadway production of "Springtime for Hitler", calculated to be so foul that its backers would never recover a dime?)

Newspaper reporters have certain preconceptions -- mental frames for thinging about political events -- that incline them to the wrong conclusion. Dan Walters of the Sacramento Bee fell into this trap when he portrayed those testifying at the CPR hearing at UC Davis on September 27 as special interest defenders of an illogical and inefficient status quo. True, the predominant response to the proposal to eliminate citizen boards and commissions was: "My commission (on which I sit/ that regulates me/that my group lobbies) is (different from the others/ doing a good job/ vital to California) and eliminating it would (harm the people/ signify lack of respect/ put me out of a job)." The trap was sprung when the professional cynicism of the journalist led Walters to write that the hearing "was, if nothing else, graphic display of why true government reform is almost impossible". In order to "fit the frame" of "special interests blocking change", Walters was led by reflex to portray the CPR as "true reform":

"In fact, despite its awesome bulk, the report is a fairly mild rearrangement of responsibilities and authority that, if anything, falls far short of the severe, but constructive, pruning that state government sorely needs after many decades of pile-on expansion."

Sorry. Wrong Moral. The CPR is not true reform, but a fake. The opposition may stem largely from petty self-interest, but a policy is not made worthy just because it has unworthy opponents. As explained in earlier posts here, the CPR is defective at its core. Specifically, the big claims that we'll save gigabucks falsify and misrepresent the supporting evidence. The attempt to make State agency outputs and outcomes fit a corporate performance model is based on crude and incorrect notions of how government works. The plan to reorganize all state functions into eleven monolithic mega-bureaus is inefficient and foolish, and the CPR's "accountability = follow the leader" mantra resembles Fascism with a celebrity face.

Professor Tax believes that the key to the significance of the CPR episode lies in recognizing that der Gövernor’s political style is what sociologists call "charismatic" -- leadership by inspirational personality (enhanced by years of practice before the camera.) The theorists explain that "Charismatic authority is radically opposed to rational and particularly bureaucratic authority. The personality cult of the leader is inherently unstable." Like other famous charismatics -- whether good or evil, Christ or Mao Zedong, Franklin Roosevelt or Hitler -- Arnold’s talents do not incline to cheese-paring the State budget or managing the immense swirls of paper and electrons that make up the rational structure of today’s bureaucratic state. He needs to pose with sword in hand, with all lenses fully focused upon him.

Schwarzenegger’s most salient feature is his vanity -- a vanity so gigantic that it even overcomes the natural cynicism of the press. "Surely," they reason, "one who thinks so highly of himself must have some basis for his opinion." His entire career, from the Mr. Universe days thru Hollywood, has been built on securing the approval of others. Our Governor Narcissus is so vain that he can even laugh at his own vanity.

But vanity is also Arnold’s tragic flaw. His position gives him unique opportunities to alter the world, but so far he has passed them up, in favor of cheap applause and trivial adulation. Think what the impact would be if Arnold announced a general pardon for all Californians now jailed or on parole for nonviolent drug possession. Think what a hero he would be if he renounced his fake hydrogen Humvee and declared in favor of higher taxes on oil and on cars as a way to fight against global warming and California’s ruin. What if Arnold one day saw the light and announced that he had become a Democrat? Could anyone else dream of slaying the heathcare cost monster? Or of restraining the limitless accumulation of wealth? Could anyone but Arnold dare to challenge California -- a state named after an imagined civilization, a mythic Utopia -- to create the best educated, the most thoughtful and considerate, the most confident and forward-looking society yet known on earth?

But he won’t. He can’t. He's too afraid of failure. No cojones.

Lessons learned: If the CPR had succeeded, Arnold would take the credit, when it proves unworkable, he can disclaim it, and when nothing comes of it, he can campaign against the "special interests" who sabotaged reform. The Performance Review is one instance of a dynamic process that Professor Tax predicted last January, where those around the charismatic leader engage in a Darwinian struggle for his attention and approval.

"Arnold’s friends and appointees will predictably disorganize and weaken the rational operations of state government and fiscal policies in the course of 'working towards the Governor'. This can be interpreted as showing that rational government is failing, justifying additional grants of power to our charismatic ruler."

The Moral: California, like every nation, will get the charismatic leader it deserves.

As Producer Max Bialystock once said: [windows media file download]

great content!
Visit my site too, relating to negotiating debt reduction site. It deals with negotiating debt reduction and other related stuff. Check it out if you get time :-)
I was searching blogs,and I found your site.Please,
accept my congratulations for your excellent work!
If you have a moment, please visit my site:
ca cal job
It pretty much covers ca cal job related issues.
Have a good day!
motivation books
black mold exposureblack mold symptoms of exposurewrought iron garden gatesiron garden gates find them herefine thin hair hairstylessearch hair styles for fine thin hairnight vision binocularsbuy night vision binocularslipitor reactionslipitor allergic reactionsluxury beach resort in the philippines

afordable beach resorts in the philippineshomeopathy for eczema.baby eczema.save big with great mineral makeup bargainsmineral makeup wholesalersprodam iphone Apple prodam iphone prahacect iphone manualmanual for P 168 iphonefero 52 binocularsnight vision Fero 52 binocularsThe best night vision binoculars here

night vision binoculars bargainsfree photo albums computer programsfree software to make photo albumsfree tax formsprintable tax forms for free craftmatic air bedcraftmatic air bed adjustable info hereboyd air bedboyd night air bed lowest pricefind air beds in wisconsinbest air beds in wisconsincloud air beds

best cloud inflatable air bedssealy air beds portableportables air bedsrv luggage racksaluminum made rv luggage racksair bed raisedbest form raised air bedsbed air informercialsbest informercials bed airmattress sized air beds

bestair bed mattress antique doorknobsantique doorknob identification tipsdvd player troubleshootingtroubleshooting with the dvd playerflat panel television lcd vs plasmaflat panel lcd television versus plasma pic the bestadjustable bed air foam The best bed air foam

hoof prints antique equestrian printsantique hoof prints equestrian printsBuy air bedadjustablebuy the best adjustable air bedsair beds canadian storesCanadian stores for air beds

migraine causemigraine treatments floridaflorida headache clinicdrying dessicantair drying dessicantdessicant air dryerpediatric asthmaasthma specialistasthma children specialistcarpet cleaning dallas txcarpet cleaners dallascarpet cleaning dallas

vero beach vacationvero beach vacationsbeach vacation homes veroms beach vacationsms beach vacationms beach condosmaui beach vacationmaui beach vacationsmaui beach clubbeach vacationsyour beach vacationscheap beach vacations

bob hairstylebob haircutsbob layeredpob hairstylebobbedclassic bobCare for Curly HairTips for Curly Haircurly hair12r 22.5 best pricetires truck bustires 12r 22.5

washington new housenew house houstonnew house san antonionew house venturanew houston house houston house txstains removal dyestains removal clothesstains removalteeth whiteningteeth whiteningbright teeth

jennifer grey nosejennifer nose jobscalebrities nose jobsWomen with Big NosesWomen hairstylesBig Nose Women, hairstyles
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?